Lender
Secret Now Leaking Out
There's something lenders don't want to tell you, a little secret that can save
homeowners thousands of dollars.
It works like this: Rates have fallen and you want to refinance a fixed-rate loan. You
contact your lender and discover that because you're a great and wonderful person and all
your payments have been full and timely, you're qualified to refinance. New papers will be
required, and that will mean a new closing, legal fees, survey, appraisal, and perhaps a
bunch of taxes.
What lenders don't say is this: You may be able to refinance without the need to fill
out 900 forms or pay big closing costs.
For instance, several years ago rates were down and I needed to refinance an investment
property. I called the lender and said, "let's modify the loan."
I exchanged letters with the lender setting out the new terms. My attorney looked at
the letter, the lender accepted, and that was it. Total cost: about $35.
What really happened was this: The property was not
refinanced. Instead, the loan terms were modified. Because the terms of an existing
loan were changed, there was no need to record a new loan. Since there was no new loan,
there was also no need for a new closing, title search, or smaller checking account.
None of this is especially revolutionary. There are millions of adjustable rate
mortgages and the terms for such financing change constantly with new rates and payments.
When these changes are made, no one refinances. The terms change because both lender and
borrower have agreed that the loan provisions can be modified.
We now have lenders who have gone public with ARM products where the initial rate is
also the highest rate. If interest levels drop, the loan rate also falls.
Given the choice of an ARM where rates can rise and fall, or an ARM where rates can only fall, you can bet that few consumers will opt for the greater
risk of possibly higher rates -- unless lenders want to make such loans attractive with
significantly easier qualification terms, lower rates, and fewer costs.
But while the modification "genie" is now somewhat out of the bottle, there
is more to go.
Not only can new ARMs be modified, so can millions of existing loans whether they are ARMs or fixed-rate products. If
lender and borrower agree, loans terms can be changed to whatever might be mutually
acceptable.
So the next time you get the urge to refinance, stifle that feeling and think
"modification." Increasingly, lenders will welcome such thinking -- or lose your
business.
Question: I borrowed $100,000 several years ago and would
now like to increase the loan amount to $150,000. Can a loan modification work in this
case?
When a loan is recorded there's typically a tax based on the mortgage amount. Thus if a
loan is modified and the interest rate, monthly principal, and loan length are changed,
there is no event to tax. But if the mortgage amount increases above the original
principal, then a state government will likely see "new" financing and something
to tax.
A second reason that loan amounts likely cannot be increased with a modification is
this: Suppose a home has two loans, a first loan used to acquire the property and a second
mortgage, perhaps a home equity loan. In this case, if the size of the first loan
increases, the security of the second lender declines.
When a home is foreclosed all money is used to pay off the first loan holder. Any
remaining money is used to settle the claims of the second lender, and then the third
lender, and so on. If there is little or no money left over after the claims of the first
lender have been satisfied, the other lenders lose.
If we increase the size of the first mortgage, we also unfairly increase the risk of
any second or third lender.
Question: I can refinance with no closing costs so why
should I look for a loan modification instead?
There is a difference between "no closing costs" and "no costs." In
your situation, the lender is paying your closing expenses. The lender must get that money
from somewhere, and that "somewhere" is your loan in the form of a somewhat
higher rate than might otherwise be available, a larger loan amount, a prepayment penalty
if you quickly refinance, and perhaps all three.
Question: My lender will allow me to modify my loan, but
only if I get a new appraisal. Why should I pay this cost?
Because it's not unreasonable, it's cheaper than refinancing, and it assures the lender
that the property has sufficient value to justify continuing the loan.
Question: If a borrower can ask for less interest when
rates go down, why can't lenders ask for more interest when rates go up?
They can -- and you can say "no."
The goal of the lender is to make more loans and generate more income. The goal of the
borrower is to have less debt with less cost.
The reason for a lender to accept a loan modification request is to continue the loan
and the stream of interest and servicing revenue it represents. If a modification request
is not accepted, perhaps you'll refinance elsewhere.
Borrowers have different motivations, and since a fixed-rate loan agreement is in place
and favorable to them in a rising market, consumers have no incentive to accept higher
rates -- unless a lender would like to make some concessions.
Question: Other than money, why do lenders prefer
"refinancing" rather than a loan modification?
Replacing an existing loan with a new mortgage can substantially impact lender risk.
For example, if you live in California and buy a home with a new loan, your financing is
generally considered a "purchase money mortgage." If you're foreclosed or go
bankrupt, the lender gets back the house but cannot sue you for any shortfall. However, if
you "refinance" you no longer have a "purchase money mortgage" and a
lender can seek a deficiency judgment if you're foreclosed.
Question: I have a lender who will agree to a mortgage
modification. Do I just write them a letter to create the new terms?
You want your attorney to review any proposed loan changes before signing anything.
Question: Are loan modifications a new concept?
The The Common-Sense Mortgage (HaperPerennial) in 1994 and in later editions
discussed the concept in detail -- and surely there were other sources which earlier
described loan modifications